Comments for dfreelon.org http://dfreelon.org Deen Freelon, associate professor, American University School of Communication Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:58:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.18 Comment on ReCal3: Reliability for 3+ Coders by Areej http://dfreelon.org/utils/recalfront/recal3/#comment-135017 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:58:44 +0000 http://dfreelon.org/?page_id=18#comment-135017 How can we know the 95% CI of Krippendorf’s alpha results?

]]> Comment on ReCal: reliability calculation for the masses by Lucas Lopes http://dfreelon.org/utils/recalfront/#comment-135014 Mon, 17 Apr 2017 03:56:36 +0000 http://dfreelon.org/?page_id=16#comment-135014 I’d like to thank you for this excellent tool. It gave me reliable results to my framing analysis. I’ll let you know if my work be accepted for publication.

]]> Comment on ReCal3: Reliability for 3+ Coders by Enas http://dfreelon.org/utils/recalfront/recal3/#comment-135013 Fri, 07 Apr 2017 02:50:24 +0000 http://dfreelon.org/?page_id=18#comment-135013 Dear
thanks for this resource. I am wondering if I can use it for evaluating the content validity of an instrument. I have 10 raters in the first round and 6 for the second round. I have utilized 5-point Likert scale.
I have used this website, but the fliess kappa and the alpha were negative while the percentage of agreement was high. HOW CAN I QUANTIFY THE INTER-RATER AGREEMENT FOR MY DATA
THANKS

thanks

]]> Comment on ReCal3: Reliability for 3+ Coders by I. Zaugg http://dfreelon.org/utils/recalfront/recal3/#comment-135008 Thu, 02 Mar 2017 09:26:15 +0000 http://dfreelon.org/?page_id=18#comment-135008 I would be interested to know the same.

]]> Comment on ReCal3: Reliability for 3+ Coders by I. Zaugg http://dfreelon.org/utils/recalfront/recal3/#comment-135007 Thu, 02 Mar 2017 09:25:40 +0000 http://dfreelon.org/?page_id=18#comment-135007 Thank you for sharing this valuable research tool!

]]> Comment on New ReCal feature: ‘Export Results to CSV’ by Kenneth Sikonkwane http://dfreelon.org/2009/10/12/new-recal-feature-export-results-to-csv/#comment-134964 Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:51:48 +0000 http://dfreelon.org/?p=55#comment-134964 This is a wonderful tool, particularly for calculating the somewhat tedious but very useful Krippendorf’s alpha. Thank you for making it freely available online.

]]> Comment on ReCal: reliability calculation for the masses by Sophia http://dfreelon.org/utils/recalfront/#comment-134925 Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:00:04 +0000 http://dfreelon.org/?page_id=16#comment-134925 Thank you very much for this useful and easy-to-use software! I searched
many pages of Google-search results before I could find this software, the only one I know which can calculate Scott’s pi. I’ll let my research-methods students know of it.

]]> Comment on Beyond the Hashtags Twitter data by Ed Summers http://dfreelon.org/2017/01/03/beyond-the-hashtags-twitter-data/#comment-134882 Tue, 03 Jan 2017 21:58:52 +0000 http://dfreelon.org/?p=907#comment-134882 If you installed twarc on Windows recently the interface has changed. It’s no longer

twarc.py –hydrate ids.txt > tweets.json

and is now:

twarc hydrate ids.txt > tweets.json

That being said I haven’t actually tested the twarc install on Windows … I’ll add that to the todo list!

]]> Comment on Beyond the Hashtags Twitter data by Ed Summers http://dfreelon.org/2017/01/03/beyond-the-hashtags-twitter-data/#comment-134881 Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:57:33 +0000 http://dfreelon.org/?p=907#comment-134881 Hmm, I guess I didn’t add the Hydrator link correctly here it is as plain text:

https://github.com/docnow/hydrator#readme

]]> Comment on Beyond the Hashtags Twitter data by dfreelon http://dfreelon.org/2017/01/03/beyond-the-hashtags-twitter-data/#comment-134880 Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:56:35 +0000 http://dfreelon.org/?p=907#comment-134880 Thanks Ed. I changed the code to work within Python for simplicity’s sake (I can’t get the generic twarc command to work in the Windows command line).

]]>